For many Olympic-related sports bodies in the USA, surviving fiscal impact of pandemic would be like winning a gold

For many Olympic-related sports bodies in the USA, surviving fiscal impact of pandemic would be like winning a gold

U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee chief executive Sarah Hirshland sounded the storm warning last week, in a virtual staff meeting as well as a letter and Q-and-A fact sheet to the USOPC’s constituents.

Hirshland did it again Tuesday in an athlete town meeting call that a person who listened to it described as “pretty much the same doom and gloom.”

She told of USOPC budget cuts of 10-to-20 percent that could include staff cuts and already include voluntary salary cuts of 20 percent (Hirshland) and 10 percent (the other eight top executives). And then there was the ominous passage, about the impact on the USOPC if the postponed-until-2021 Tokyo Olympics have to be cancelled because of the coronavirus pandemic.

“The impact of a cancellation would be devastating to our athletes, first and foremost, but also to our financial health and stability,” said the FAQ sheet, a copy of which was obtained by Globetrotting. “We would survive such a scenario, but the impact would be severe.”

The USOPC can survive because it has an endowment in excess of $200 million it could use in a “`worst-case’ scenario.” That has not yet become the situation, the FAQ said, but it reach that level if Tokyo 2020 does not take place – a possibility evoked by two prominent members of Japan’s medical community in the last 10 days.

Cancellation would create a much more dire situation for the National Governing Bodies that help train and support the athletes who become part of U.S. Olympic and Paralympic teams. Many would go from weathering the storm to rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

Read More

Staying afloat financially: for Olympic organizations, loans may be short-term fix in uncertain times

Staying afloat financially: for Olympic organizations, loans may be short-term fix in uncertain times

In these days of near total uncertainty about the impact and duration of the coronavirus pandemic on our lives, even moments of clarity are lost in the blur of the big, frightening picture.

We know the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games now are supposed to begin July 23, 2021. Emphasis on supposed to. Not only a Cassandra would look at the pandemic’s uncontrolled and growing scope and prophesy that there is a good chance those Olympics will not take place then – or ever.

Especially given this from Allen Sills, the National Football League’s chief medical officer, in an NFL.com story Thursday: "As long as we're still in a place where when a single individual tests positive for the virus that you have to quarantine every single person who was in contact with them in any shape, form or fashion, then I don't think you can begin to think about reopening a team sport." And the story continued with Sills saying it is too early to think about dealing with large groups of fans until a vaccine is available.

Yet because trying to look forward is far more rewarding, especially in terms of mental health, all the players hoping for a 2020/1 (or 2020One) Summer Games are searching for ways to get there.

Read More

U.S. Olympic CEO deserves credit for decision to take pay cut, but she and board still should be shown the door

U.S. Olympic CEO deserves credit for decision to take pay cut, but she and board still should be shown the door

When it comes to tone-deafness and managerial ineptitude, I thought I had seen and heard it all in my nearly 40 years covering the leadership and operations of the U.S. Olympic Committee.

I should have known better.

I feel that way even though U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee chief Sarah Hirshland executive has, to her credit, agreed to take a voluntary pay cut of an unspecified amount from her $600,000 annual salary, as she revealed in a Friday statement to Globetrotting.

The USOC may have changed its name to the USOPC last July, but it has not changed the spots that have made its operations a confounding detriment to the athletes it is supposed to serve.

The USOPC bottomed out morally in its untenable decision to ask Congress for $200 million of the federal coronavirus stimulus bill funds, as first reported Wednesday by the Wall Street Journal.

Read More

Even in (finally) arriving at the right choice by postponing 2020 Olympics, actions of top U.S. and IOC officials were inglorious

Even in (finally) arriving at the right choice by postponing 2020 Olympics, actions of top U.S. and IOC officials were inglorious

Now that sanity has prevailed, and the 2020 Tokyo Olympics have been moved to 2021 because of the coronavirus pandemic (but will still be called the 2020 Tokyo Olympics in the International Olympic Committee’s parallel universe), what can we take away from the way the decision was reached and about its ramifications?

A handful of thoughts:

1. The IOC’s abysmal handling of its messaging over the last month will be a case study in how not to do public relations.

Read More

U.S. Olympic leaders decline leadership role on fate of 2020 Tokyo Olympics, refuse to call publicly for postponement

U.S. Olympic leaders decline leadership role on fate of 2020 Tokyo Olympics, refuse to call publicly for postponement

The leaders of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee, chief executive Sarah Hirshland and board chair Susanne Lyons, did just what I expected in a Friday media teleconference,

They equivocated.

Completely passed the buck to the International Olympic Committee on the fate of the 2020 Olympics rather than have the USOPC stake out a higher moral ground, which the IOC long has been unwilling to do on far more matters than just the coronavirus issue.

Fell back on bureaucratic speak.

Repeated several variations on the mantra, as expressed by Lyons, “I can assure you there is no circumstance when the USOC would send our athletes into harm’s way.”

Declined to take a stand showing they meant what that mantra implies.

Read More