Even so close to Opening Ceremony of Tokyo Olympics, there is time to avoid having fools rush into decision on their fate

Even so close to Opening Ceremony of Tokyo Olympics, there is time to avoid having fools rush into decision on their fate


As of early this week, there were 3.3 million deaths worldwide attributed to the Covid-19 virus,

And yet the Japanese government and the International Olympic Committee continue to set the tables for a July global party that 59 percent of the Japanese population wants cancelled, according to polling done last Friday through Sunday.

In that poll, postponement was not an option. Another poll in April showed 70 percent of the population wanted the Tokyo Summer Games either cancelled or postponed again, as they had been from 2020 to 2021.

Make no mistake about it: the Tokyo Olympics are in essence a shindig, a giant, made-for-TV, ATM of a sports festival, sort of a wedding reception on steroids. And think of how many wedding receptions and family celebrations have been cancelled or postponed in the face of a pandemic still raging out of control in some of the world’s most populous countries, notably India and Brazil.

The preparations and regulations necessary in the hope of keeping the Olympics from becoming a feast for the coronavirus mean they will be essentially a joyless party, a wedding with no food or dancing, a festival without the cultural interactions that are supposed to make the Olympics more than just another sporting event.

No foreign spectators. Maybe no domestic ones, either. Strict distancing and masking rules. Little freedom of movement for everyone directly involved.

Is that the youth of the world assembling to celebrate the Olympics, as called for in the ritual appeal at the Closing Ceremony of the previous Games? Only if they stay two meters apart.

Read More

Why L.A. 2028 might not be such a good deal - for the city or the IOC

Why L.A. 2028 might not be such a good deal - for the city or the IOC

Now what for Los Angeles and a Summer Olympics it apparently won’t have until 2028?

For a number of reasons, an unprecedented 11-year wait between being named host city for the Games and staging them is fraught with potential pitfalls.

Costs will rise.  Contracts may need renegotiation.  Opponents will have more time to make their case.  The political landscape in Los Angeles could change dramatically.

Such issues need to be addressed because all signs currently point to the International Olympic Committee deciding in July to award both the 2024 and 2028 Summer Games rather than have Los Angeles and Paris contend for the lone prize they originally thought was at stake, the 2024 Olympics.

And, although this is less certain, the conventional wisdom now is that the IOC will not be smart enough to see the obvious reasons for giving 2024 to Los Angeles rather than Paris.

 

Read More

A tone deaf IOC won't hear what cities do: hosting the Olympics sounds like sour notes

A tone deaf IOC won't hear what cities do: hosting the Olympics sounds like sour notes

How’s that Olympic Agenda 2020 thing working out, Mr. Bach?

All that hot air about reform and cost-cutting in both bidding for and staging the Games that filled a Monaco conference center in 2020, inflating a balloon of self-congratulations that has been leaking ever since?

“Like most people, I am sick and tired of hearing the mantra of Olympic Agenda 2020,” Canada’s Richard Pound said in an email.

Pound is the senior member of the current 95 in an International Olympic Committee presided over by Mr. Thomas Bach since September 2013.

Agenda 2020 was rushed to a vote in December 2014 after cities in five countries either dropped out of bidding for the 2022 Winter Olympics or, in one case, dropped even the idea of a bid after public opposition.  That left just the capitals of two authoritarian nations in a race Beijing won over Almaty, Kazakhstan, despite serious environmental and logistical issues related to having skiing events in a low-snow area miles away from the host city.

And, then Mr. Bach, it was barely six months after your IOC membership rubber-stamped Agenda 2020 that cities in the 2024 Summer Games race began laughing at an emperor who still had no clothes.

Read More

Smith and Carlos to represent for Team USA. Right on.

Smith and Carlos to represent for Team USA.  Right on.

It was going to be just a gesture of reconciliation, a long overdue welcome back for sprinters Tommie Smith and John Carlos, an invitation for them to be part of the Olympic family in the United States again after nearly 50 years as institutional outcasts.

Now, thanks to an accident of timing and the good intentions of the U.S. Olympic Committee leadership, it can be so much more.

There is a backstory here, and I will talk about it later.  But, right up front, it should be said that the USOC’s asking the two 1968 Mexico City medalists to be U.S. Olympic ambassadors and to accompany members of the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic teams on their White House visit Thursday is an important statement in these troubled times for our nation.

“The conversation they started in 1968 is still relevant today.  They are still relevant today,” USOC spokesman Patrick Sandusky said.

Read More